"Certainly a dangerous gift, power without kindness, inventive
slyness without understanding. The corruptedly cultivated human
being wants only to be able, to have, to rule, to enjoy, without
considering to what end he is able, what he has, and whether what
he calls enjoyment does not eventually turn into the killing of all
enjoyment."
----Herder, Letters for the Advancement of Humanity, #115.
Recently in Lahore, Pakistan a US private security contractor,
Raymond Davis, was arrested by Pakistani police for the murder
of two men. He was alone with an unregistered gun in a crowded
business district of the city. One of the victims was shot in the
back. The first few days after the alleged crime a tale was spun
that Davis had no connections to the US Embassy in Pakistan and
that he killed the two men out of self defense. When the ballistics
of the event were established and numerous witnesses stepped
forward the self defense argument evaporated. Strangely, after
guilt seemed more likely from forensics, the US Embassy reversed
it's early dismissal of Davis by stating he's a diplomat and deserves
immunity. Yesterday President Obama stated, falsely I might add,
that Davis should not be held for the crime of murder because of
International Standards on Diplomatic Immunity. First, immunity
does not cover all crimes committed by Diplomatic personnel. Grave
crimes, and we believe a double murder reaches this standard, do
not, by those same standards, merit the protections of Diplomatic
Immunity. Second, Diplomatic Immunity can only be enforced when
a diplomat is in the process of performing diplomatic functions. I
doubt Davis was attending a function illegally armed and shooting
two men. Can one foresee the tortuous casuistry in attempting to
state a double murder while alone in a business district was a
Diplomatic Function. Third, since when are private security
contractors labelled "diplomats"? And what of the early disavowals
of the alleged murderer as an "outside actor" not connected to the
US Government?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The President of the United States is now trying to help an alleged
murderer escape due process in Pakistan. Ironic the US denies
due process and all rights of recourse, habeas corpus etc., when
when we suspect a Pakistani may be connected to the killing of
an American. The US drone bombing policy is based on a Legal
Standard that people alleged to be "terrorists" can be killed,
along with innocent bystanders, without any legal process observed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
US policy explicitly states it can murder suspects in foreign lands
without any judicial consideration while US financed private security
contractors are allowed to murder people in the same land under
the protection of Diplomatic Immunity. This policy is consistent
in its standard of providing impunity for the lawless enforcement of
executions committed by the forces of US empire in foreign lands.
It also exposes the psychotic insistence that the US can murder
suspects without any standard of legality and can also evade any
kind of accountability when a contractor is caught murdering
people. A complete lack of fealty to any standard of International
Law is what the US demands. But when a single actor is caught
committing a grave crime they run for the protections of that
same disparaged International Law.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pakistan is on the brink of chaos. Senator John Kerry has been
sent to Pakistan to negotiate for Davis' release. If the Pakistani
gov't succumbs to US pressure there will be riots. Our supposed
ally will suffer a grave debasement in its people's eyes. If he is
released there will be unrest and the likelihood of a Coup by
the military. No future regime will be unable to cool the rage of
the people by aiding US interests concerning AF-PAK efforts.
The people are already deeply enraged by the escalating Drone
Bombing policy of President Obama inside Pakistan. Thousands
of women and children have been killed. Add an American
private security contractor granted immunity from judgement on
a murder charge and one more match will be thrown on dry grass.
1 comment:
Why would private security have anything to do with diplomatic immunity.. ever.
Irra Tional
Post a Comment